A director's loan account (DLA) is one of the most-used and most-misunderstood tools in owner-managed company tax. For a property landlord operating through a limited company, the DLA is often the structural mechanism that makes the early years of incorporation work: a credit balance arising from the s.162 incorporation transfer funds tax-free extraction for several years before the dividend route becomes necessary. The same instrument, drawn the wrong way, creates an overdrawn balance that triggers a corporation tax charge on the company under CTA 2010 s.455 at 35.75% of the loan.

This page is the generic UK pillar and explainer. It covers both directions of the DLA, the four statutory anchors (s.455, s.464A, s.453, and the ITEPA beneficial-loan BIK framework), and the HMRC official rate of interest. For property-specific applications, read our companion pages on director loan account property company mechanics and BTL SPV director loan repayment strategy.

The two directions of a DLA

Credit balance: company owes director

A credit balance arises whenever money has flowed FROM the director TO the company without immediately becoming the director's salary or dividend or share-capital subscription. Typical sources:

  • Founder-injected start-up capital. The director lends £20,000 to the company at incorporation to fund the deposit on the first property; the company records the £20,000 as a DLA credit balance.
  • Deferred dividend declarations. The board declares a dividend but does not pay it; the unpaid amount sits as a credit balance until physically paid out.
  • Value differential on TCGA 1992 s.162 incorporation. When an existing rental portfolio is transferred into the new company in exchange for shares, the difference between the market value of the property transferred in and the nominal value of the shares issued out is typically recorded as a director loan credit balance. This is the structural mechanism that funds tax-free extraction for several years after incorporation.
  • Loan-back arrangements. The director receives cash from the company in one form (for example a dividend) and lends it straight back; the dividend was taxable in the director's hands but the loan back is now a credit balance.

Credit balances are repayable tax-free to the director: the repayment is a return of capital, not income.

Debit balance: director owes company (overdrawn DLA)

A debit balance arises when money flows FROM the company TO the director beyond their salary, dividend, and other formally-declared entitlements. Typical sources:

  • The director draws cash from the company for personal use without putting it through payroll or declaring a dividend.
  • The company pays personal expenses on behalf of the director.
  • The director uses the company credit card for personal spending.

Overdrawn DLAs may trigger the s.455 charge on the company and the beneficial-loan BIK on the director.

The s.455 charge on overdrawn DLAs

CTA 2010 s.455 imposes a corporation tax charge on close companies that make loans to participators (typically directors who are also shareholders). The mechanic:

  • The charge falls on amounts of the loan that remain unpaid 9 months and 1 day after the end of the accounting period in which the loan was made.
  • The rate is set by reference to the dividend upper rate at ITA 2007 s.8(2). For 2026/27 onwards the rate is 35.75% (raised from 33.75% by FA 2026 s.4(1)(b) effective 6 April 2026).
  • The charge is payable as if it were corporation tax for the AP in which the loan was made, and the company includes it on the CT600 return.
  • The charge is refundable on later genuine repayment of the loan. The refund is claimed via Form L2P, and is payable 9 months and 1 day after the end of the AP in which the repayment was made, with a 4-year refund window from that point.

The cash-flow effect: the company pays the s.455 charge with the corporation tax for the AP of the loan, and waits up to 12 months after eventual repayment to receive the refund. For a £80,000 overdrawn DLA at 35.75% the charge is £28,600; the company must fund this from operating cash flow until the refund cycle catches up.

Anti-avoidance: the FA 2025 omission and s.464A

Historically, two specific anti-avoidance provisions sat alongside s.455:

  • CTA 2010 s.464C: 30-day bed-and-breakfast rule. Where a participator repaid a loan AND the same close company made a further loan to the same participator within 30 days, the repayment was treated as not relieved against the s.455 charge.
  • CTA 2010 s.464D: £15,000 intention-to-redraw extension. Where the repayment was £15,000 or more and there was an intention to redraw, similar treatment applied.

Both provisions were OMITTED in full by Finance Act 2025 section 81(3)(b) and (4) with effect from 30 October 2024. The 30-day specific rule and the £15,000 intention-to-redraw rule are no longer on the statute book. Any reference to ss.464C and 464D as live anti-avoidance is now incorrect; treat them as historical.

The residual anti-avoidance is at CTA 2010 s.464A: charge to tax on arrangements conferring benefit on a participator. The provision imposes a CT charge on close companies that participate in arrangements designed to confer a benefit on a participator (or their associate), where the benefit does not already trigger an income tax charge or s.455 charge. The rate is calculated by reference to the dividend upper rate at ITA 2007 s.8(2), giving 35.75% from 6 April 2026 (same numeric position as s.455).

The economic substance of repay-and-redraw schemes remains catchable under s.464A; the 30-day specific test has been replaced by a broader "arrangements conferring benefit" framework that requires HMRC to identify the substance of the arrangement rather than mechanically count days. In practical terms, the scope of attack is wider than the historic ss.464C/D position; the discipline for directors who genuinely repay and later genuinely re-borrow under separate independent circumstances has not changed materially, but artificial repay-redraw structures designed to defeat s.455 face the same exposure under s.464A as they did under the historic provisions.

The s.453 close-company benefits framework

CTA 2010 s.453 sits in the broader close-company anti-avoidance architecture covering benefits provided to participators. It informs HMRC's reading of the boundary between deductible commercial transactions and disguised participator benefits. In the DLA context, s.453 supports HMRC's challenge where company-side "loans" lack the features of a genuine loan: zero interest below the HMRC official rate, no repayment schedule, no documentation, no enforcement.

The discipline: document every director loan with a written loan agreement, set an interest rate (the HMRC official rate is the safe-harbour floor), record repayments contemporaneously, and treat the arrangement as a genuine commercial transaction between separate persons.

Want this checked against your specific situation?

Drop your email and a one-line summary. We reply within 24 hours, no phone call needed.

Beneficial-loan benefit in kind under ITEPA 2003

Where a director (or any employee) has loans from the employer totalling more than £10,000 at any point in the tax year AND the company charges less than the HMRC official rate of interest, the difference is a taxable benefit in kind under ITEPA 2003 ss.173 to 191.

The HMRC official rate of interest for beneficial loans is:

  • 3.75% for the period 6 April 2025 to 5 April 2026.
  • 3.75% from 6 April 2026 onwards (no change at the 2026/27 boundary).

The rate is reviewed periodically and may move; verify the current rate at the gov.uk Beneficial loan arrangements page before any client decision.

BIK mechanics:

  • BIK = average loan balance × HMRC official rate × proportion of tax year.
  • Director-side: the BIK is income tax-charged at the director's marginal rate.
  • Employer-side: Class 1A NIC at the FA 2026 employer NIC rate on the BIK.
  • Reported on P11D (or via payrolling if elected).

The £10,000 qualifying-loans exemption: where the total of all qualifying loans does not exceed £10,000 at any point in the tax year, no BIK arises regardless of interest charged.

Five worked examples

Example 1: s.455 charge on overdrawn DLA

Patel Property Ltd has an accounting period ending 31 March 2027. During the period, director Anil Patel drew £80,000 from the company beyond his salary and dividend entitlement, creating an £80,000 debit DLA balance at year-end. He does not repay before 1 January 2028 (9 months and 1 day after year-end).

s.455 charge: £80,000 × 35.75% = £28,600 corporation tax due, payable as if it were CT for the AP ending 31 March 2027. The charge is provisional; it is refundable on later genuine repayment via Form L2P.

Example 2: s.455 refund on later repayment

Continuing Example 1: Anil repays £40,000 of the £80,000 DLA during the AP ending 31 March 2028 (genuine repayment from after-tax personal funds, not redrawn).

s.455 refund: £40,000 × 35.75% = £14,300 refundable by HMRC. The refund is claimable 9 months and 1 day after the END of the AP in which repayment was made, so the refund is payable from 1 January 2029.

The cash-flow trap: the company pays £28,600 in January 2028 and waits until January 2029 to recover £14,300, even though the repayment happened during the same accounting year as the refund-trigger event. Plan the cash flow before relying on the refund mechanic.

Example 3: s.464A residual anti-avoidance

Singh Property Ltd: director Vikram Singh has £100,000 overdrawn DLA at year-end. Three days before year-end he engages an arrangement under which the company makes a £100,000 "consultancy payment" to a connected company that immediately makes a £100,000 loan back to Vikram. The Singh-side DLA is repaid; the connected-company loan is functionally identical in economic substance.

HMRC argues this is an "arrangement conferring benefit on participator" within s.464A, designed to avoid the s.455 charge. The charge under s.464A is calculated by reference to the dividend upper rate at ITA 2007 s.8(2) (35.75% from 6 April 2026), same as s.455. Net result: arrangement defeated; s.464A charge applied to the £100,000 "benefit".

Compare the historic position: before 30 October 2024, the bed-and-breakfast specific rule at s.464C would have applied where repayment and redraw occurred within 30 days of each other (same close company). FA 2025 omitted s.464C and s.464D in full. The residual anti-avoidance is the broader s.464A framework; the substantive answer is the same in this fact pattern, but the analytical route is different.

Example 4: Beneficial-loan BIK

Kapoor Property Ltd lends £30,000 to director Meera Kapoor interest-free for personal use (above the £10,000 qualifying-loans exemption threshold).

BIK calculation: £30,000 × HMRC official rate 3.75% × 12/12 (full year) = £1,125 cash-equivalent BIK.

Personal tax: Meera reports £1,125 as employment income on P11D (or via payrolling), taxed at her marginal income tax rate. If higher-rate, £1,125 × 40% = £450 income tax.

Employer NIC: company pays Class 1A NIC on the £1,125 BIK at the FA 2026 employer NIC rate. Total tax cost to employer and Meera combined: around £600 to £700 depending on rates.

Compare to the alternative: charge Meera interest at the HMRC official rate (3.75%) from the loan inception. No BIK arises, no employer NIC. Interest paid is taxable savings income on Meera; the company gets a CT-deductible interest expense if the source-of-funds analysis supports it. The net household tax cost is usually lower under the interest-charging route, especially for higher-rate directors.

Example 5: Incorporation s.162 credit balance and the exhaustion trap

Mrs Kapoor incorporated her BTL portfolio in 2024 under TCGA 1992 s.162. The transfer of 6 properties worth £900,000 (book value at the time) created a £900,000 DLA credit balance representing the value differential between the property transferred in and the shares issued out.

Tax-free repayment route: Mrs Kapoor draws £6,000 per month from the company as DLA repayment. No income tax. No National Insurance. Just repaying her own loan to the company. Annual draw £72,000 tax-free.

DLA exhaustion calculation: £900,000 / £72,000 per year = 12.5 years until the DLA exhausts (assuming no other draws or top-ups, and no further injections).

The exhaustion trap: in year 12 to 13, Mrs Kapoor must shift to a dividend or salary or pension extraction route. Her tax cost jumps from £0 (DLA repayment) to (illustratively) £72,000 × 35.75% effective dividend rate at higher-rate band = around £25,000 per year of additional personal tax.

Founders often treat DLA-funded draws as permanent income and do not plan for the post-exhaustion cliff. The discipline: model the exhaustion year explicitly, start blending in dividend extraction 2 to 3 years before exhaustion to smooth the transition, and avoid the year-13 surprise.

Practical DLA discipline

For any director loan, the documentation expected:

  • Written loan agreement between the company and the director, signed and dated.
  • Stated interest rate (the HMRC official rate is the safe-harbour floor for beneficial-loan BIK purposes).
  • Stated repayment terms (on-demand, fixed schedule, or other).
  • Contemporaneous accounting entries each time the balance moves.
  • Annual statement to the director of the closing balance, interest accrued, and any movement.
  • Year-end accounts disclosure under FRS 105 or FRS 102 related-party transaction rules.

The most common HMRC challenges at enquiry: undocumented draws appearing as DLA debits at year-end with no contemporaneous record of the underlying transaction; "loans" that lack the features of a genuine loan (no interest, no repayment terms, no enforcement) and are recharacterised as distributions or benefits; repayments funded by dividend declarations that postdate the bookkeeping entry (HMRC treats the dividend as the income event and the repayment as a separate transaction).

Where this page sits in the cluster

This is the generic UK pillar. The child pages cover specific applications:

Read this page first for the generic mechanic; follow the cross-links to the specialist applications for the property-LtdCo depth.